Today’s physics news: Friday, 5 March

Promises to reform physics research council
UK physicists have responded positively to the promise of a longer-term solution to the Science and Technology Facilities Council’s funding issues. The promise was made by the UK’s science minister yesterday.

BBC
Physics World

New names for science subjects
A guide issued by the Qualification and Curriculum Development Authority has been criticised by the Tories for ‘dumbing down’ by replacing the names biology, chemistry and physics organisms and health”, “chemical and material behaviour” and “environment, Earth and universe”.

Daily Telegraph
The Sun

Posted in Daily Physics News | Leave a comment

Response to restructuring of the Science and Technology Facilities Council

The Royal Astronomical Society (RAS) and the Institute of Physics (IOP) have today responded to the statement by Lord Drayson, Minister of Science and Innovation, setting out reforms to the structure of the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC).

Professor Dame Jocelyn Bell Burnell, president of IOP, and Professor Andrew Fabian, president of the RAS, said: “We thank Lord Drayson for initiating this review to resolve the structural problems caused by the three disparate strands of science that STFC funds.

“We have been particularly concerned about the way in which unforeseeable rises in international subscriptions due to the falling value of the pound have put extreme pressure on the funding available from STFC both for research grants and the running of UK-based facilities.  Today’s announcement demonstrates that the problem has now been recognised and we look forward to seeing how it will be addressed.   IOP and RAS trust that the Treasury will recognise the importance of science by taking responsibility for currency fluctuations.

“The longer-term commitment to planning for our superb national facilities is really welcomed. Only through sustained investment and planning can researchers using national facilities like the Diamond Light Source, the Central Laser Facility and ISIS maximise the return on the investment which the UK has already made.

“We are encouraged that Lord Drayson agrees that the grants should remain with STFC since this will also maximise the return on the UK’s investment in the overseas telescopes and accelerators used by the researchers in those fields, as the grants and international facilities can be managed most effectively together. 

“We now look forward to working with Professor Sterling in helping to ensure that STFC is able to deliver the very best science programme.
 
“Looking at the science base as a whole, we remain concerned about the overall impact on science funding as the pressure on the public purse becomes increasingly acute.  We urge that the government continues to recognise the value of investment in the science base and funds accordingly.”

To see a copy of the announcement, go to http://www.stfc.ac.uk/PMC/PRel/STFC/STFCMinisterialReview.aspx

Posted in Daily Physics News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Today’s physics news: Thursday, 4 March

Interstellar dust caught
Volunteers inspecting images captured by NASA’s Stardust spacecraft may have identified pieces of interstellar dust – fundamental building blocks of the solar system.  The discovery could mark the beginning of an analysis of what stars and planets are really made of.

Nature

Wales to have its own learned society
Welsh academics are aiming to create their own version of the Royal Society with the launch of the first Learned Society for Wales. The society, which will be based in Cardiff, will promote learning and scholarship and disseminate Welsh research.

THE

Growing dominance of the privately educated in postgrad research
In a blow to widening participation, a study by the London School of Economics has found a small but growing gap between the postgraduate participation rates of otherwise like-for-like private school and state school students.

THE

Posted in Daily Physics News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Today’s physics news: Wednesday, 3 March

Academics should develop exam content, say The Tories
In a speech to the annual conference of the Advisory Committee on Mathematics education, Michael Gove, the UK’s shadow education secretary, has announced that a Tory government would hand control of A-level content to universities and academic experts, scrapping the current quango in control of content (the QCDA), and would offer every child the chance to study the three sciences separately at GCSE.

Guardian
Daily Telegraph

Hawking to leave UK in science funding protest
The Daily Mail reports on Professor Hawking’s plan to move to Canada.  A spokesperson for Hawking has said that the professor  ‘remained heavily critical of the Government’s policy on science funding’, saying it risked ending Britain’s history of world-class thinkers.

Daily Mail

Institute of Physics issues clarifying statement
The Guardian has reported on IOP’s latest statement about its submission to the Parliamentary Science and Technology Committee’s inquiry into the East Anglia climate data affair. The latest statement reasserts IOP’s policy on man-made climate change.

Guardian

What to call a number 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000?
A campaign to name the number 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 ‘hella’ is attracting strong support from scientists. An online petition started in California – where the word ‘hella’ is slang for ‘many’ – is calling for the word to become an internationally recognised prefix, joining the likes of  ‘yotta’, ‘zeta’, ‘exa’ and ‘peta’.

Daily Mail
Physics World

Posted in Daily Physics News | Leave a comment

2010 Schools Lecture – part two

Our 2010 School Lecture presenter Dr Melanie Windridge on her lecture tour and fusion reaction:

The second destination on my country-wide schools lecture tour was Liverpool.  I was speaking at the University of Liverpool to pupils of various different schools in the area.

Now, before we start to talk about the fusion reaction used in tokamaks, we’re going to recap some basic atomic physics.  In the talk I do this as a quiz to make it a bit more fun.  It’s not a very difficult quiz for GCSE students, because they should have already learnt all of this at school.
 
An atom consists of a nucleus at the centre and electrons that go round the outside.  Back in the late 1800s when J.J. Thomson first discovered electrons, it was thought that the atom looked a bit like a plum pudding – a positive pudding with little negative electron-raisins embedded in it. 

Then Rutherford and students discovered that the electron is actually mostly empty space and the model of the atom became more like that of the solar system, with a big, heavy nucleus at the centre and electrons orbiting around like planets around the Sun. 

The nucleus is only 100,000 of the size of the atom, which is like saying that if the nucleus were a pinhead at the centre of a football stadium then the electrons would be outside the back of the stands.  In fact, there is so much empty space in the atom that if you took out all the space from all the atoms in the human race we would all fit into a teaspoon! 
The solar system model gets us a bit closer to the picture of the atom, but this couldn’t be quite right either, since circling like this the electrons would gradually lose energy and spiral into the nucleus.  Atoms can only be explained by quantum theory, so we now think of an electron “cloud” surrounding the nucleus, where the electrons flit about, sometimes here, sometimes there, because in the quantum world particles can be in several places at once…. 

However, strange and interesting as it is, I’m not going to go into quantum theory here.  Instead, let’s talk about the nucleus, since it is the nuclei that fuse.  The nucleus is very small but contains 99.9% of the mass of the atom.  It is made up of protons (positively charged) and neutrons (neutral) and so has a net positive charge.  

The type of atom depends on the number of protons in the nucleus, for example hydrogen has one proton, helium has two, lithium has three.  But the same type of atom does not always have the same number of neutrons (pictured below)  These are all hydrogen, with one proton, but deuterium and tritium have extra neutrons and are known as isotopes of hydrogen.  These isotopes of hydrogen are what we fuse in the tokamak. 

In a neutral atom the positive charge of the protons is exactly balanced by the negative charge of an equal number of (equally, but negatively, charged) electrons.  If the atom is missing one or more electrons then it is charged and is called an ion.     

2010 Schools Lecture   part two iop schools lecture 2010
 

So now we come to the fusion reaction in tokamaks.  Fusion is the combining of two smaller nuclei into a larger one.  For fusion energy from tokamaks, deuterium and tritium will be combined to form helium and a neutron (pictured below).  This is not the same as the fusion reaction that occurs in the Sun. 

2010 Schools Lecture   part two iop schools lecture 2010
 
In the Sun, fusion of hydrogen to helium happens in three stages: two protons combine to form deuterium (one emits a positron and turns into a neutron); the deuterium combines with another proton to form helium-3 (an isotope of helium with only one neutron); two helium-3 nuclei combine to form helium-4. 

Fusion in the Sun proceeds very slowly, taking hundreds of million years for two protons to fuse.  This is pretty lucky for us, since otherwise all the fuel in the Sun would have burned out before life on Earth could evolve, but it’s not too useful a reaction for us do use on Earth to make energy. 

Fusing two protons into deuterium is the slowest step of the reaction, so starting with deuterium saves time, as now protons and neutrons only need to be rearranged rather than turned into other things.  There are a few different fusion reactions involving deuterium, but the deuterium-tritium (DT) reaction is considered the best for a power plant because it requires the lowest amount of energy to get it started and is the fastest.
   deuterium + tritium ? helium + neutron

So that’s the basic fusion reaction.  After our discussion of atoms, nuclei and charges you may have picked up on a small difficulty in getting fusion to occur.  We are fusing nuclei together, and the nuclei are both positively charged, so they will repel each other. Opposites attract, or like charges repel.  They don’t want to come together and fuse.  Next time, I’m going to tell you how we overcome this force of repulsion and get fusion to happen.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Posted in IOP Schools Lecture 2010 | Tagged , | Leave a comment
  • Sign up to daily physics news direct to your inbox.

    Enter your email: